According to Breitbart:
The plaintiff-borrowers argued Biden’s administration violated federal law by denying borrowers an opportunity to provide public comment before rolling out the program.
Judge Pittman reasoned that “The Constitution vests ‘all legislative powers’ in Congress. This power, however, can be delegated to the executive branch. But if the executive branch seeks to use that delegated power to create a law of vast economic and political significance, it must have clear congressional authorization.”
Just last year there wasn't much question that Biden *did not* have the ability to cancel student debt with the stroke of a pen, with even Speaker Nancy Pelosi explaining to reporters at a news conference in July 2021 that “People think that the President of the United States has the power for debt forgiveness. He does not. He can postpone. He can delay. But he does not have that power. That has to be an act of Congress.”
That all raises an obvious question: did Biden know that the courts would block his bailout eventually, but pushed it anyway to "buy votes" ahead of the midterms? As we saw with vaccine mandates (among many other issues) that does seem to be the Biden administration's strategy; to simply break the law knowing that it'll take the courts months to years to catch up, by which point the damage is already done.
Matt Palumbo is the author of The Man Behind the Curtain: Inside the Secret Network of George Soros
Don't miss The Dan Bongino Show
