In this episode I address the revealing comments last night by former congressman Trey Gowdy on Hannity. I also address the appointment of John Durham to investigate Spygate. Finally, I address the China tariffs and the positive effects of the Trump tax cuts.
In this episode I address astonishing new information which will forever bury the credibility of the Russia-gate conspirators. I also discuss new information about the scheme to entrap George Papadopoulos.
In this episode I address the troubling comments by a key Obama national security figure about the Obama administration’s involvement in Russia-gate. I also address the exploding crisis in Venezuela and the ridiculous anti-Trump comments by this key media figure.
In this episode I address the Joe Biden campaign announcement for President and the many scandals he’ll have to deal with. I also address the key question being left out of the debate about Spygate scandal.
While the overwhelming majority of us knew it all along, last month Robert Mueller’s special counsel colluded without a single indictment related to collusion between the Trump campaign and Russia. Some liberals are still holding out hope that Robert Barr’s summary of the Mueller report is dishonest, though I’m certain that Barr has the foresight to know that people will read the actual Mueller report when it is released and thus wouldn’t lie.
So on that note, I had to chuckle when one of the Russia collusion hoax’s chief propagators challenged people to find any errors in his reporting. Alongside Michael Isikoff (who has had information leaked to him from dossier author Christopher Steele), David Corn published a book titled “Russian Roulette: The Inside Story of Putin’s War on America and the Election of Donald Trump.” After its release, Joe Biden said of Corn’s book last year “if this is true, it’s treason.” Mueller certainly couldn’t find any evidence it was true.
Corn’s challenge began with a twitter spat with Matt Schlapp, with Corn alleging that Schlapp has made more incorrect statements related to Russian collusion than he. That’s completely irrelevant considering that Corn got the conclusion wrong regardless, but his challenge is an easy one.
The Papadopoulos Myth
One of the more obvious myths that Corn pushes (that even he must know is false) is that George Papadopoulos sparked the FBI’s counterintelligence investigation into the Trump campaign after he allegedly claimed to know that the Russians possessed Hillary Clinton’s hacked emails (which, if they do possess, we’ve seen no evidence of).
As I’ve argued elsewhere, the timeline on the FBI’s investigation does not support this.
- The most relevant detail is that the FBI didn’t even bother to interview Papadopoulos until January 2017 – after he allegedly spilled the beans over Russian collusion in May 2016. If they were so concerned that he possessed information that would have proven collusion, why wait? Papadopoulos would eventually be charged with making false statements to the FBI during an interview on January 27, 2017—a minor charge that has led to no indictment relating to collusion.
- The evidence for that is undeniable that Steele and the dossier he was working on sparked the investigation: Nellie Ohr worked for the company that created the dossier (Fusion GPS) and met with her husband Bruce Ohr from DOJ, and dossier author Christopher Steele on July 30, 2016 Bruce Ohr then met with the FBI on the same day, July 30, 2016 and the FBI case is opened the next day, July 31, 2016.
Don Jr. and Putin Collusion
In July 2017, Corn argued that Donald Trump Jr. was evidence of collusion with Russia, citing the now infamous Trump Tower meeting with Russian lawyer Nataliya Veselnitskaya.
Corn also argued that “The Trump Jr. emails [he released following the meeting being publisized] also provide partial support for some information within the Steele dossier.”
Ironically, Veselnitskaya has more in common with the dossier than with Putin, and the meeting looks like a setup.
Veselnitskaya was working with Fusion GPS at the time of her meeting with Trump Jr. In other words, Veselnitskaya, a Russian lawyer, was working with the firm trying to “prove” Russian collusion with the Trump campaign, right as she set up a meeting with Donald Trump’s son. Veselnitskaya met with Fusion’s co-founder Glenn Simpson the day of, and the day after the Trump Tower meeting. What do you think they discussed, if not how to further solidify the optics of the collusion narrative?
Among the men who accompanied Veselnitskaya to the meeting included translator Rinat Akhmetshion, a former Russian spy who also worked for the Clinton State Department. If Trump Jr. did “bite” and say anything incriminating, he was there to make sure nothing was lost in translation. Luckily, Trump Jr. didn’t say anything incriminating, because there wasn’t any collusion, or desire to collude.
Regardless of whether or not I’m right about Veselnitskaya’s role, no “proof of collusion” arose from that meeting.
Doubling Down on the Dossier
As we learned from FBI general counsel James Baker, Corn was eager to share some parts of the dossier with the FBI.
And even as late as December 2018, Corn was still defending the contents of the dossier.
Corn’s co-author Michael Isikoff is at least intellectually honest enough to admit that the jig is up on the dossier and that it’s completely bogus. If Corn disagrees, he’s free to point out what in the dossier has been substantiated.
As I already argued, even if Corn were right on the particular facts in making his case, his conclusion of collusion was still dead wrong, which is the only relevant detail here.
I’m not sure what terms Corn was proposing for his bet with Schlapp – but I hope this means I win something!
In this episode I address the stunning revelations by Attorney General Bill Barr yesterday about government spying. I also destroy the liberal talking points about “Medicare for all.”
By Dan Bongino and Matt Palumbo
For those advancing the myth that the FBI’s investigation into Trump began with the mid-2016 George Papadopoulos tip, please stop the nonsense. IT WAS THE DOSSIER.
It wasn’t even until December 2017 that the New York Times introduced the theory that Papadopoulos was responsible for sparking the investigation. The Times detailed how Papadapoulos allegedly told Australian diplomat Alexander Downer that he possessed dirt on Hillary Clinton, and heard that Russia possessed her hacked emails in a May 2016 meeting (obviously he didn’t possess them). Downer, who is no friend of Trump and once helped broker a $25 million donation from the Australian government to the Clinton Foundation, has since dismissed the contents of the meeting as “banal.”
While the framing of Papadopoulos could fill the pages of a book, the most relevant detail in this article is that the FBI didn’t even interview him until 2017. If they were so concerned that he possessed information that would have proven collusion, why wait? Papadopoulos would eventually be charged with making false statements to the FBI during an interview on January 27, 2017—a minor charge that has led to no indictment relating to collusion.
The evidence for that is undeniable: Nellie Ohr worked for the company that created the dossier (Fusion GPS) and met with her husband Bruce Ohr from DOJ, and dossier author Christopher Steele on July 30, 2016 Bruce Ohr then met with the FBI on the same day, July 30, 2016 and the FBI case is opened the next day, July 31, 2016.
As you already gleaned from the fact that Papadopoulos wasn’t interviewed until the following year after his alleged wrongdoings, it was clearly not he central to the FBI’s counterintelligence investigation. The same cannot be said about the dossier:
- The FBI’s Dep. Director Andy McCabe has already admitted they wouldn’t have had a FISA warrant without the dossier. According to the Nunes Memo, “McCabe testified before the Committee in December 2017 that no surveillance warrant would have been sought from the [Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court] without the Steele dossier information.”
- The FBI’s Agent Michael Gaeta interviewed dossier author Chris Steele in London weeks before the case was opened.
- Both Papadopoulos AND Downer dispute the media’s leaked account of their meeting, specifically the “dirt on Hillary” line
And lastly, when the FBI came to spy on the Trump campaign, they didn’t pick Papadopoulos, they picked Carter Page. Why? Because he’s a key player in the dossier.
The allegations against Page were comical to begin with; that he was offered a 19% in the state-owned Russian oil company Rosneft if Trump became President and lifted sanctions on Russia. Such an offer would imply a number of unlikely occurrences: the Russian government offering Page a stake in their company that would make him wealthier than Donald Trump (Rosneft’s current market capitalization is $41 billion), the Russian government surrendering their controlling stake in Rosneft (they currently own 50% of shares), and this transaction involving a public company somehow going unnoticed.
Carter Page has since been convicted of nothing, and Trump has imposed new sanctions on Russia.
In this episode I address the explosive new revelations about John Brennan’s role in the plot to take down the Trump team. I also address the key question we should all be asking: “When did Bob Mueller find out he was investigating a hoax?”
In this episode I address troubling new video of a prominent Democrat doubling down on crazy. I also address the emerging collusion scandal between the Democrats, the media, and Ukraine. Finally, I address CNN’s history of fake news and the disgraceful Jussie Smollett case.
In this episode I address one of the most troubling videos I’ve seen in a long time regarding out-of-touch government bureaucracy. I also discuss the Democrats’ new strategy of attack now that the Mueller report appears ready to drop. Finally I discuss the New Zealand gun confiscation and the dossier’s absurd claims.